FDA to crack down on labels promoting questionable foods as healthy


WASHINGTON - The Food and Drug Administration announced plans Tuesday to clamp down on food labeling that it says may mislead consumers into thinking products are more nutritious than they really are.

In particular, the FDA will target the front panels of packages bearing logos or language suggesting that the product is more healthful than the actual ingredients justify, FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg said.

"There's a growing proliferation" of symbols purporting to indicate healthfulness and "some nutritionists have questioned whether this information is more marketing-oriented than health-oriented. Judging from some of the labels we've seen, this is a valid concern," she said in a conference call with reporters.

Front-of-packaging messages are particularly important because people who look at them are less likely to look at the nutritional content listed on the side or back of a package, Hamburg said.

While declining to name specific products, she said some products labeled with the "check mark" logo under the industry-sponsored Smart Choices food rating program, "are almost 50 percent sugar." Smart Choices has emerged as a lightning rod among some nutritionists, who charge that its ratings are too lax and intended to give processed foods undeserved nutritional standing.

"I think Smart Choices was the final straw for the FDA. The idea that its check could go onto (sugary cereals like) Froot Loops made it clear that the bar had to be set higher," said Marion Nestle, a nutrition professor at New York University. "Good for the FDA. It's about time they got on the job."

Smart Choices already is under investigation by the Connecticut attorney general for its labeling practices.

Mike Hughes, chair of the Smart Choices Program, said it's unfair to focus on one ingredient in a single product. "I think you should look at the whole product and what it delivers," he said.

The Grocery Manufacturers Association, a trade group representing food producers, said in a statement that its members "have already introduced or reformulated over 10,000 products to reduce calories, sugar, sodium, fat and trans fat, or to enhance their nutritional profile, such as with the addition of whole grains or minerals."

The Center for Science in the Public Interest, a food labeling watchdog group, has criticized Smart Choices, saying it's ineffective in telling consumers what may be bad for them. On Tuesday, it offered up Kraft's Strawberry Bagel-ful as an example of a product that doesn't deserve the Smart Choices logo, even though it sports it.

In a statement, Susan Davison, a spokeswoman for Kraft, said products that quality for Smart Choices "must follow a strict standard of limiting nutrients of concern and, for most categories, including positive nutrients or food groups. Any Kraft Foods product that carries the Smart Choices Program symbol must meet these criteria."

Davison said that Kraft looks "forward to continuing to work with the FDA to help consumers make informed food choices."


Tuesday's announcement continues a trend toward more aggressive FDA enforcement across a range of issues since the Obama administration took office.

"It's part of a much broader effort to assert themselves," said Chris Waldrop, director of the Food Policy Institute at the Consumer Federation of America. "The FDA has been absent for a long time."

Hamburg said she preferred to work voluntarily with companies to tweak labeling so that it does not run afoul of FDA guidelines. But in a letter the food companies, the agency warned that it would "proceed with enforcement action where ... labeling or labeling systems are used in a manner that is false or misleading."

The FDA plans to issue new rules for nutrition-based standards that food rating programs would be required to meet.

As a possible model for a labeling protocol, Hamburg pointed to the United Kingdom's "traffic light" system in which products bear a green, amber or red light depending on it content of fat, sugar and salt.

---

(Tribune Newspapers correspondents Mary MacVean and Mike Hughlett contributed to this report.)

---

(c) 2009, Tribune Co.

Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.


For reprints, email tmsreprints@permissionsgroup.com, call 800-374-7985 or 847-635-6550, send a fax to 847-635-6968, or write to The Permissions Group Inc., 1247 Milwaukee Ave., Suite 303, Glenview, IL 60025, USA.


(C) 2009 Mclatchy-Tribune News Service.. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer: References or links to other sites from Wellness.com does not constitute recommendation or endorsement by Wellness.com. We bear no responsibility for the content of websites other than Wellness.com.
Community Comments
Be the first to comment.